Everyone is curious about the future. That's not a personality quirk, it's close to what human minds are built to do. But there's a second, quieter fact worth knowing before you read one more headline about AI: people don't just want to know what's coming, they want a confident answer. In 1961, economist Daniel Ellsberg ran an experiment showing exactly this: given a choice between two bets with the same expected payoff, one with known odds and one with unknown odds, people reliably pick the known one, because uncertainty itself feels worse than risk, even risk they might lose. That preference is exactly why the two loudest stories about AI, "it's going to collapse everything" and "it's going to save everyone", get all the attention, even though the honest answer is a little less dramatic than either one.
The rest of this analysis is reserved for RAYSolute clients
RAYSolute research is written for the institutions that commission it. Clients read the full library as part of their engagement. If you would like access, write to us and we will set it up.
Request access