Strategic market analysis: Non-profit dominated sector with severe structural undersupply. Queue-based allocation (8.8 year Stockholm wait) creates opportunity for commercial PBSA entrants.
Data as of January 2026 | Source: UKÄ, Studentbostadsföretagen, JLL Nordic
Non-profit foundations dominate 70% of supply; rent regulation (bruksvärdes) constrains commercial development
Non-profit foundations dominate; Heimstaden is largest commercial player
Stockholm premium reflects severe undersupply; regional rates ~35% lower
Crisis-level occupancy across all major markets — 8.8 year Stockholm queue confirms severe shortage
| City | Students | Current Beds | Bed Gap | Students/Bed | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stockholm | 100,000 | 21,500 | 7,000 | 4.65 | 🔴 CRITICAL |
| Gothenburg | 67,000 | 15,882 | 4,750 | 4.22 | 🔴 CRITICAL |
| Lund/Malmö | 71,000 | 14,200 | 6,750 | 5.00 | 🟡 HIGH |
| Uppsala | 35,000 | 8,800 | 1,750 | 3.98 | 🟡 HIGH |
| Umeå | 31,500 | 5,200 | 3,875 | 6.06 | 🟡 HIGH |
| Linköping | 18,000 | 7,000 | -500 | 2.57 | 🟢 BALANCED |
Non-profit dominates 70% — commercial PBSA opportunity
Stockholm leads; SGS Gothenburg adding 327 beds via Skanska
25% penetration vs UK 54% = structural undersupply; 1 in 4 students decline first-choice university due to housing
Lund leads with 47K students; KTH has highest international share (19.4%)
Umeå highest undersupply ratio; Linköping approaching balanced
€1.1B tracked activity 2022-26; Xior's Basecamp acquisition signals European REIT interest
| Transaction | Buyer | Value (EUR) | Beds | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basecamp European Portfolio | Xior Student Housing | €939M | 5,341 | 2022 |
| Stockholm Development JV | Barings + Innovation Properties | €50M | 500 | 2024 |
| Chalmers MIRA Project | Chalmers Studentbostäder | €45M | 400 | 2028 |
| SGS Skanska Contract | Skanska (construction) | €36M | 327 | 2024 |
| Various smaller deals | Multiple | €30M | 500 | 2024-26 |
Students earn queue days (1/day) which determine housing priority. Stockholm average wait: 8.8 years. First-year students effectively locked out of non-profit housing.
Utility-based rent system caps rental increases, making commercial PBSA development challenging. New-build exemptions create limited opportunity.
SSSB, SGS, AF Bostäder control 70% of supply. Mission-driven, not profit-driven. Creates service quality opportunity for commercial entrants.
1 in 4 students decline first-choice university due to housing. International students particularly affected — creates demand for premium PBSA.
Queue-based allocation system + rent regulation = structural undersupply with limited commercial competition. First-mover advantage for quality PBSA targeting international students and premium domestic segment.
Access our comprehensive library of reports, guides, and industry insights