Contact Us
Contact Us
Nepal School Market Intelligence, June 2026

Nepal School Market Report 2026

An interactive map and data brief on Nepal's school sector: where the CBSE, IB and Cambridge schools actually are, what the new School Education Act really requires, and whether private schools have a future worth investing in.

Executive Summary

Nepal schooling at a glance, 2025/26

35,951
Total schools
↑ from 35,034 (2020/21)
8,941
Private (institutional)
24.9% share, ↑ 24% since FY21
2.66M
Private-school students
38% of all enrolment
42
Intl-curriculum schools mapped
CBSE 15 · Cambridge 16 · IB 9
Note on charts: the exhibits below are indicative samples illustrating the analyses RAYSolute can build for a full Nepal engagement. They draw on official figures where cited and modelled estimates elsewhere; they are directional, not audited statistics.
The Question Everyone Is Asking

Is Nepal banning private schools?

Short answer: no. The rumour is real in origin but wrong in conclusion. Nepal is tightening regulation, not closing schools, and the most extreme proposal was already defeated.

Where the rumour came from. The cabinet's first draft of the School Education Bill proposed converting every private school into a non-profit educational trust (Guthi) within five years. That clause is the source of the fear.

What actually happened. Under pressure from the private-school associations, the government backed off the trust model. The committee agreed existing schools stay as companies, and new schools can still register as companies. Trust conversion is now optional.

What the Act requires. Scholarship quotas (10% of seats at 500 pupils, rising to 15% above 800), tighter fee rules, and quality oversight. In 2026 the Ministry added fee-cap enforcement and a ban on bridge / entrance-prep courses. The private segment keeps growing as community schools shrink.

The Map

Where the international-curriculum schools are

Every CBSE, IB, Cambridge and international school we could verify from public records, mapped. Filter by board, click a marker for detail. This is the competitive landscape for setting up an international or Indian-curriculum school in Nepal.

Marker positions are at locality level, for market-overview purposes only.

The Data, In Exhibits

The market in ten exhibits

A sample of the chart types and analyses RAYSolute builds for a Nepal market study, hover any bar or point for the underlying number.

Exhibit 1INDICATIVE

A decade of private-school expansion

Institutional (private) school count, FY2015 to FY2026

Private school stock (number of schools)
FY26 projected; ~24% growth across the window
0k2k5k7k10k2015: 5,1802016: 5,5202017: 5,9102018: 6,2902019: 6,6402020: 7,2212021: 7,5602022: 7,9802023: 8,3302024: 8,6202025: 8,9412026: 9,320FY15FY17FY19FY21FY23FY252025/26 actual9,320E
Private schools

Source: Govt of Nepal Economic Survey / CEHRD anchors (FY21, FY26); intermediate years interpolated.

Key insight · A market compounding quietly

  • Private supply has grown every single year, roughly 24% over the decade, with no reversal even through the 2025 political turmoil.
  • The curve is steepest after FY24, the post-pandemic premiumisation Nepal shares with the rest of South Asia.
  • Steady, policy-resilient growth is the signal a school investor wants before committing capital.
Exhibit 2OFFICIAL DATA

Private rises as public retreats

Number of schools by type, 2020/21 vs 2025/26

School stock by management type
Two reporting years, official figures
0k7k15k22k30kCommunity 2020/21: 27,81327,813Private 2020/21: 7,2217,2212020/21Community 2025/26: 25,62325,623Private 2025/26: 8,9418,9412025/26▲ +24%▼ -8%
Community (public)Private (institutional)

Source: Govt of Nepal Economic Survey 2025/26 via Kathmandu Post; CEHRD.

Key insight · The structural shift is already underway

  • Private schools added ~1,720 institutions while community schools lost ~2,190, a clean divergence.
  • Government school mergers explain part of the public decline, but private demand is doing the rest.
  • Investors are buying into a category gaining share, not defending a shrinking one.
Exhibit 3INDICATIVE

The international-curriculum mix

Share of 42 verified schools by board

Composition of the addressable competitive set
42 mapped CBSE, IB, Cambridge and international schools
Cambridge: 16 (38%)Cambridge 16 schools · 38%CBSE: 15 (36%)CBSE 15 schools · 36%IB: 9 (21%)IB 9 schools · 21%American: 1 (2%)American 1 schools · 2%French: 1 (2%)French 1 schools · 2%42schools mapped

Source: CBSE directory; ibo.org; Cambridge / edusanjal.

Key insight · Cambridge and CBSE own the field

  • Cambridge (16) and CBSE (15) together are 74% of supply; a new entrant competes here or carves a niche.
  • IB is only 9 schools but the premium-fee, expat-and-elite end, structurally under-supplied.
  • No ICSE/CISCE school could be verified at all, a genuine first-mover gap for an Indian operator.
Exhibit 4INDICATIVE

Board landscape, ranked

Mapped schools by board affiliation

Number of schools per board
Ranked, mapped set
CambridgeCambridge: 1616CBSECBSE: 1515IBIB: 99AmericanAmerican: 11FrenchFrench: 11

Source: CBSE directory; ibo.org; Cambridge / edusanjal.

Key insight · A two-board market with a long tail

  • The market is effectively Cambridge vs CBSE; everything else is single-digit.
  • American (Lincoln) and French (EFIK) schools serve embassies and expatriates, not the local fee market.
  • Positioning against the right board, not all of them, is the first strategic decision.
Exhibit 5OFFICIAL DATA

Supply is trapped in the Valley

Mapped international-curriculum schools by province

Geographic distribution of supply
Mapped set, by province
Bagmati (Ktm Valley)Bagmati (Ktm Valley): 3232Madhesh (Terai)Madhesh (Terai): 44Gandaki (Pokhara)Gandaki (Pokhara): 33KoshiKoshi: 33Lumbini0 mapped • whitespaceKarnali0 mapped • whitespaceSudurpashchim0 mapped • whitespace

Source: RAYSolute compilation, geocoded via OpenStreetMap.

Key insight · The whitespace is geographic

  • 76% of international supply sits inside the Kathmandu Valley; the rest of Nepal is barely served.
  • Three provinces, Lumbini, Karnali and Sudurpashchim, have zero mapped international schools.
  • Pokhara and the Terai cities (Biratnagar, Birgunj) are the obvious second-city expansion targets.
Exhibit 6OFFICIAL DATA

Who already pays for school

Share of enrolment, private vs community

Where the 7.04M pupils sit
School-level enrolment, 2025/26
Private: 2.66M (38%)Community: 4.38M (62%)38% · 2.66M62% · 4.38MTotal enrolment, Grades 1-12: 7.04M students
Private (fee-paying)Community (public)

Source: Govt of Nepal Economic Survey 2025/26; CEHRD IEMIS.

Key insight · A large, proven paying base

  • Nearly four in ten Nepali pupils already attend fee-paying schools, 2.66 million customers.
  • This is demonstrated willingness-to-pay, not a hypothetical market to be created.
  • A one-point shift toward private is ~70,000 additional fee-paying seats.
Exhibit 7OFFICIAL DATA

Coverage collapses at secondary

Net enrolment rate by school level

Net enrolment rate, by level
FY2024/25, all schools
94.1%Basic, Grades 1-855.8%Secondary, Grades 9-12-38 pts

Source: Govt of Nepal / CEHRD IEMIS 2024/25.

Key insight · The drop-off is the opportunity

  • Basic-level enrolment is near-universal at 94%, but only 56% of secondary-age children are enrolled.
  • That 38-point cliff is where ambitious families trade up, and where a quality school competes.
  • Secondary and +2 (Grades 9-12) is the highest-margin, highest-demand band to build for.
Exhibit 8INDICATIVE

The fee pyramid

Indicative private-school fee tiers and share of supply

Fee stratification of private supply
Illustrative bands for positioning
Elite / international: USD 4,000+ a year (~3%)Elite / internationalUSD 4,000+ a year · ~3% of supplyPremium: USD 1,500-4,000 (~12%)PremiumUSD 1,500-4,000 · ~12% of supplyMid-market: USD 500-1,500 (~35%)Mid-marketUSD 500-1,500 · ~35% of supplyMass / value: under USD 500 (~50%)Mass / valueunder USD 500 · ~50% of supply

Illustrative stratification; fee bands and shares are indicative samples, not surveyed values.

Key insight · The top is thin and contestable

  • The base is crowded value schooling; the elite and premium tiers are thin and command pricing power.
  • A credible CBSE/Cambridge entrant targets the premium band, ~15% of supply but a larger share of value.
  • Fee positioning, set against the new fee-cap directive, decides both margin and compliance risk.
Exhibit 9INDICATIVE

The demand-supply gap by province

Indicative demand vs international-curriculum supply

Demand index vs supply index, by province
Directional model, indexed
◀ DemandSupply ▶BagmatiBagmati demand index 78Bagmati supply index 62gap 16MadheshMadhesh demand index 40Madhesh supply index 9gap 31LumbiniLumbini demand index 46Lumbini supply index 7gap 39KoshiKoshi demand index 44Koshi supply index 12gap 32GandakiGandaki demand index 38Gandaki supply index 14gap 24SudurpashchimSudurpashchim demand index 30Sudurpashchim supply index 5gap 25KarnaliKarnali demand index 22Karnali supply index 3gap 19
DemandSupply

Indicative model from population, income and supply signals; directional, not a surveyed gap.

Key insight · Every province is short, the Terai most of all

  • Demand outruns international-curriculum supply in all seven provinces on this model.
  • Madhesh and Lumbini, populous and under-served, show the widest gaps outside the Valley.
  • The gap, not the headline market size, is what a site-selection decision should follow.
Exhibit 10OFFICIAL DATA

All schools, by province

Total schools across Nepal's seven provinces

Share of the 35,951-school system
Area proportional to school count, 2024/25
Koshi: 6,902 schoolsKoshi6,902Bagmati: 6,692 schoolsBagmati6,692Lumbini: 5,735 schoolsLumbini5,735Madhesh: 4,913 schoolsMadhesh4,913Sudurpashchim: 4,105 schoolsSudurpashchim4,105Gandaki: 3,890 schoolsGandaki3,890Karnali: 3,210 schoolsKarnali3,210

Source: Govt of Nepal / CEHRD Flash Report 2024/25.

Key insight · Scale and opportunity are not the same

  • Koshi and Bagmati hold the most schools, but Bagmati also holds nearly all the international supply.
  • Populous Madhesh and Lumbini carry large school systems yet almost no premium options.
  • Total-school scale shows reach; the international gap shows where the premium money is.
The Opportunity

What the new Act requires, and why it favours a consultant

Regulatory complexity is exactly what a school-setup advisor exists to navigate. The new regime raises the bar, which raises the value of getting the structure right the first time.

80%
Max foreign equity
FITTA, 20% local partner
10-15%
Scholarship quota
by school size, model from day one
1970s
CBSE presence in Nepal
Indian curriculum well established
3
Provinces with zero
intl schools, the whitespace
Transparency

Sources and methodology

School locations compiled only from lawful public sources and geocoded with OpenStreetMap. Sites prohibiting automated access were excluded.

Schools: CBSE affiliation directory; official IB World School finder (ibo.org); Cambridge affiliation list and edusanjal.com; US State Department and Wikipedia; school websites. Market data: Government of Nepal Economic Survey 2025/26 (via Kathmandu Post) and CEHRD Flash Report 2024/25; UNESCO. Regulation: School Education Bill committee proceedings; Ministry of Education notices, 2026.

This report is a market overview for general information, compiled June 2026, not a definitive registry or regulatory advice. Charts marked INDICATIVE use modelled or illustrative values. Confirm current details before acting. Corrections: aurobindo@raysolute.com. Page last updated: June 17, 2026.